The Browns made history when they acquired Deshaun Watson prior to the 2022 season. Not only did Cleveland trade three first-round picks to add the quarterback, but they immediately signed him to an unprecedented fully guaranteed five-year, $230 million contract.
More than a year and a half later, the partnership hasn't exactly gone as planned.
Watson's 2022 debut was always going to have an asterisk after the QB missed the first 11 games due to suspension for an alleged pattern of sexual misconduct. But he had career-worst production in the games that followed, completing just 58% of his throws in a six-game stretch. Things have only gotten muddier in 2023, with Watson sandwiching sloppy performances between injury-related absences; he led a Week 10 comeback against the Ravens, but only after throwing his fourth pick in six games.
The Watson who once looked like a long-term face of the NFL has been mostly invisible. Only six QBs currently make more money per year, and three of them have either won NFL MVP or appeared in a Super Bowl. It's only fair if Browns fans are wondering: Is it possible to get out of Watson's controversial contract? Is it even feasible for Cleveland to look ahead at QB?
The short answer is: not yet. If the Browns were to outright release Watson after 2023, per Over the Cap, they'd instantly lose $136.9 million, or roughly 53% of the entire projected 2024 salary cap. That cannot and will not happen. Even if they were to designate him a post-June 1 cut, the net loss would be $92M -- also unfathomable. Barring a restructure on Watson's end (which seems highly unlikely, considering his representation specifically negotiated a fully guaranteed deal that even included workarounds for his 2022 suspension), the soonest the Browns could cut the QB without losing tens of millions is 2026, the final year of his deal.
In that scenario, a post-June 1 cut after the 2025 season would result in a dead-cap hit of $109.9M -- the current record is $40.5M, when the Falcons traded QB Matt Ryan -- but the Browns would at least avoid an immediate loss of 2026 cap space. Because Watson's deal is fully guaranteed, remember, there is technically no scenario where the team can release the QB and save cap room.
Pick Six Newsletter
Crafted By The Best NFL Experts
Get the day's big stories + fun stuff you love like mock drafts, picks and power rankings.
By pressing sign up, I confirm that I have read and agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge Paramount's Privacy Policy.
See All Newsletters
Please check the opt-in box to acknowledge that you would like to subscribe.
Thanks for signing up!
Keep an eye on your inbox.
Sorry!
There was an error processing your subscription.
The other option, of course, is a trade. But that would require another team inheriting Watson's unprecedented contract, complete with his on- and off-field baggage. "Salary-dump" deals aren't totally unprecedented in the NFL, but even that possibility -- of the Browns essentially paying another team to unshackle them from Watson's deal -- seems remote, considering his lucrative cap charges. Just look at Russell Wilson in Denver; that's a Super Bowl-winning QB with nowhere near the character concerns, and yet the Broncos' lucrative commitment to Wilson all but prevented them from shopping his contract after a disappointing 2022 debut.
If cutting or trading Watson isn't realistic until years down the line, then where can the Browns find solace? To be frank, their bed was made the minute they executed the Watson trade-and-extension. No amount of cap manipulation can easily erase that decision. But if Watson truly cannot return to form as a QB, either under the current regime or a new one, the other scenario involves him taking a seat as the highest-paid backup in the history of the NFL.
A permanent demotion of Watson would require Cleveland to have a legitimate alternative, which is an entirely different issue considering how much money the team already has tied to the position. And that's not accounting for money-allocation at other important positions. For example, how could they expect to field a premium offensive line or skill group if they're trying to compensate both Watson and another starting QB? But at least, if it truly reached that point, and if Watson hadn't renegotiated to expedite his exit by that point, they'd be admitting the Watson money wasn't well-spent, and giving another QB a chance.
 - Def Startup)